DAVIS MOORE THESIS MERITOCRACY

Third, people need money in order to trade goods and services even in an egalitarian society. Second, it is true that children of rich families are more privileged but given a fairly equal educational opportunity everyone can have a chance to progress. Secondly, Davis and Moore do not clearly indicate why some positions should be worth more than others, other than the fact that they are remunerated more, claiming, for example, that teachers are equally, if not more, functionally necessary than athletes and movie stars, yet, they receive significantly lower incomes. But to what extent the stratification is beneficial? Posted by Unknown at 9: Second, disregarding the cast element of social stratification. Answering phone calls, bagging in a grocery store, or entering data on a computer are fairly easy and can be done by almost anyone but jobs such as web programming, accounting audition, or designing automobiles are more advance and require personnel with sufficient trainings and experience.

Answering phone calls, bagging in a grocery store, or entering data on a computer are fairly easy and can be done by almost anyone but jobs such as web programming, accounting audition, or designing automobiles are more advance and require personnel with sufficient trainings and experience. According to Davis-Moore egalitarian society last as long as people let anyone perform any job. Greater rewards create motivation for people in the society to educate themselves. Why would corporate workers have any incentive for promotion when they would get the same rewards with less responsibility? Secondly, Davis and Moore do not clearly indicate why some positions should be worth more than others, other than the fact that they are remunerated more, claiming, for example, that teachers are equally, if not more, functionally necessary than athletes and movie stars, yet, they receive significantly lower incomes. Posted by Unknown at 9: Second, it is true that children of rich families are more privileged but given a fairly equal educational opportunity everyone can have a chance to progress.

  BCIT CASE STUDY COMPETITION

davis moore thesis meritocracy

By studying Davis-Moore thesis one may object Tumin criticisms. Newer Post Older Post Home. It makes the society productive and efficient.

Secondly, Davis and Moore do not clearly indicate why some positions should be worth more than others, other than the fact that they are remunerated more, claiming, for example, that teachers are equally, if not more, functionally necessary than athletes and movie stars, yet, they receive significantly lower incomes. Their customer service is outstanding, never left a query unanswered.

But to what extent the stratification is beneficial?

One thing that can lose its value in an egalitarian society is the quality of work. Views Read Edit View history. These critics have suggested that structural inequality inherited wealth, family power, etc. Davis and Moore argue that the most difficult jobs in any society are the most necessary and require the highest rewards and compensation to sufficiently motivate individuals to fill them.

This argument has been criticized as fallacious from a number of different angles. The hypothesis is an attempted explanation of social stratificationbased on the idea of “functional necessity”. It is argued that if abilities were inherent, there would be no need of a reward system.

Davis–Moore hypothesis

Upper Merigocracy River, New Jersey: According to Davis-Moore egalitarian society last as long as people let anyone perform any job. Once the roles are filled, the division of labour functions properly, based on the notion of organic solidarity advanced by Emile Durkheim.

Thursday, November 22, Analyzing Davis-Moore thesis.

davis moore thesis meritocracy

Anna May 9, at 5: Melvin Tumin criticized Davis-Moore theses based on three reasoning: Workers in an equal society will have little incentive moord do their best because everyone gets the same rewards regardless of any extra effort. According to Davis-Moore thesis, more important jobs shall offer greater rewards. This page was last edited on 24 Marchat First, the Davis-Moore thesis does not suggest what reward a society should give to any given job or how unequal the wealth should be distributed.

  ABGABE DISSERTATION LMU MÜNCHEN

Greater rewards create motivation for people in the society to educate themselves. Functionalism social theory Sociological theories. And why would anyone want to work in a mine?

According to this thesis social stratification has positive consequences for the operation of a society. Posted by Unknown at 9: The only difference is the people in an egalitarian society are confined in limitation where as in meritocracy there is no limit. As a structural functionalist theory, it is also associated with Talcott Parsons and Robert K.

The thesis merely suggests more rewards for more important positions in order to distinguish between different talents and create incentives.

Davis–Moore hypothesis – Wikipedia

The Davis—Moore hypothesissometimes referred to as the Davis—Moore theoryis a central claim within the structural functionalist paradigm of sociological theory, and was advanced by Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

davis moore thesis meritocracy

Answering phone calls, bagging in a grocery store, or entering data on a computer are fairly easy and can be done by almost anyone but jobs such as web programming, accounting audition, or designing automobiles are more advance and require personnel with sufficient trainings and experience.

Second, it is true that children of rich families are more privileged but given a fairly equal educational opportunity everyone can have a chance to progress. Second, tjesis the cast element of social stratification.